Invest 30 seconds...
...for what may lead to a life altering association!
Help Line
- +91.8800.2828.00 (IND)
- 1030-1830 Hrs IST, Mon-Sat
- support@expertsglobal.com
On GMAT CR, this flaw appears when a reply sounds reasonable but ignores the passage’s main claim. Identify the author’s core point, then test each response against it. Eliminate options that discuss side issues or introduce new issues.
Critical Reasoning often rewards focus on an argument’s central claim. This lesson outlines how to identify the main point, map supporting premises, and test whether responses engage that point rather than drift to tangential benefits or facts. You will practice recognizing relevance in dialogues and eliminating options that sound reasonable yet bypass the core issue. The approach reinforces disciplined reading for GMAT prep and trains concise, purpose-driven evaluation valued in MBA admissions, setting up the video and subsequent stepwise article.
One common reasoning flaw tested in GMAT Critical Reasoning is when the responder completely misses the main point of the argument. This happens when a reply sounds logical in itself but fails to address the central concern raised. Instead of engaging with the actual issue, the responder speaks about related or secondary aspects, thereby leaving the core concern untouched.
Consider the following…
Aamir: With many key players out of form, our soccer team is unlikely to win the tournament.
Brenda: The tournament is likely to attract worldwide media coverage, enhance goodwill among the competing nations, and be a huge commercial success for the sponsors.
Question: Which of the following identifies a flaw in Brenda’s response?
Correct Answer: It fails to respond to Aamir’s primary concern.
On the GMAT, recognizing this flaw is crucial because test-makers often design answer choices that sound persuasive but avoid the core issue. Students who are not vigilant may mistakenly consider such responses as valid reasoning.
Step 1: Review the question stem first to determine the precise requirement.
Step 2: Examine the reasoning in detail; create your mind-map and identify the missing-link.
Step 3: State your broad expectation from the correct answer choice.
Step 4: Cross out four answer choices; the choice that remains is your answer.
Verify once before final confirmation.
This article center on developing the discipline to identify when a response misses the central claim of an argument. The GMAT frequently embeds such flaws in dialogues, where seemingly logical replies ignore the actual issue raised. To avoid this trap, focus on mapping the main concern and testing each statement against it. Consistent practice with GMAT simulations builds this precision, sharpening your reasoning for both exam performance and the structured decision-making demanded in professional and academic contexts.
In life, as in reasoning, clarity comes from recognizing what truly matters and not being distracted by peripheral noise. Missing the main point on the GMAT reflects the same challenge leaders face in business and beyond: distinguishing the essential from the incidental. Just as a well-analyzed GMAT mock reveals gaps in focus and understanding, experiences in MBA applications and professional decisions demand centering on the core concern. Growth lies in refining the discipline to engage directly with what is most important, cultivating judgment that is both precise and meaningful in every sphere of life.
