Invest 30 seconds...
...for what may lead to a life altering association!
Help Line
- +91.8800.2828.00 (IND)
- 1030-1830 Hrs IST, Mon-Sat
- support@expertsglobal.com
Probability on the GMAT sometimes uses set theory and Venn diagrams to manage overlapping groups. The key is to label regions clearly, separate exact cases like “only one” or “exactly two,” and then define favorable outcomes correctly against the total.
Probability on the GMAT often appears in the form of set theory questions, where overlapping groups and conditions must be carefully interpreted. A common mistake is to treat these problems as purely numerical exercises, while in reality, they are logical puzzles built on Venn diagram structures. The ability to see through the overlaps, separate exact cases, and avoid double counting is what allows a student to solve such questions quickly and accurately. For instance, problems may ask about people who belong to exactly two categories, or those who belong to none. The challenge is to carefully break down the information into clear regions and then define the favorable outcomes against the total. Developing this structured approach is a vital part of serious GMAT prep course, and practicing it repeatedly in timed GMAT practice tests ensures that the reasoning becomes second nature even under the stress of the exam.
Set theory is often the hidden framework behind many probability questions on the GMAT. Whenever groups overlap, Venn diagrams help us visualize exactly where people or objects belong. For example, when some individuals belong to only one category, some to two, and a few to all three, the overlaps can become confusing without a structured approach. By carefully labeling each region and distinguishing between “only,” “exactly two,” and “all three,” you avoid double counting and misinterpretation. Once the regions are clear, calculating probabilities becomes straightforward, as favorable cases can be counted precisely against the total.
In a group of 100, 30 drink only tea, 20 drink only coffee, and 15 drink only mocha. 5 drink none of the three and 10 drink all the three. What is the probability that a person picked up randomly drinks exactly two of the three?
There are 100 people in all. Out of them, 30 drink only tea, 20 drink only coffee, 15 drink only mocha, and 5 drink none of the three.
We also know that 10 people drink all three beverages.
The question asks: what is the probability that a randomly chosen person drinks exactly two of the three?
The key lies in identifying the overlapping sections of the Venn diagram.
The three intersections that represent exactly two drinks together account for 20 people.
Therefore, the favourable cases are 20.
Since the total number of people is 100, the required probability is 20/100 = 0.2, or 20 percent.
Set theory in probability highlights that clarity of representation is often more important than calculation. When overlaps are mapped correctly, the solution naturally emerges without confusion or repetition. This habit of visualizing and organizing information is critical not only for probability but for many reasoning tasks across the GMAT. Building such disciplined clarity ensures that word-heavy problems no longer feel overwhelming. Practicing regularly in simulated GMAT setting reinforces this skill under exam-like pressure, allowing you to recall structures quickly and solve with confidence when time is short and accuracy is essential.
Set theory reminds us that clarity comes from seeing the whole picture and then carefully understanding how its parts overlap. On the GMAT, this mindset prevents confusion and ensures precise reasoning. The MBA application process works in the same way: essays, recommendations, and test scores may appear separate, yet their strength lies in how they connect to present a complete story. Life too is filled with overlapping roles and responsibilities, and wisdom lies in recognizing where they intersect. True progress comes from managing these intersections with balance, insight, and a clear sense of purpose.
