GMAT DS: When is a Statement Considered Sufficient?

Short Answer

A GMAT Data Sufficiency statement is sufficient only when it leads to a unique and consistent answer — a single value, yes, or no. If multiple values are possible, or if both yes and no are possible, creating a maybe situation, the DS statement is insufficient.

Overview

Knowing when a Data Sufficiency (DS) statement is sufficient is central to mastering DS. Many students mistakenly believe that only a unique numeric value or a yes can be sufficient. In truth, sufficiency means a unique, consistent conclusion: either one specific value, a definite yes, or a definite no. If more than one value fits, the statement is insufficient. If both yes and no remain possible, you have a maybe, which is insufficient. The method is simple: test Statement 1 alone, then Statement 2 alone. Decide whether each delivers a unique, consistent outcome. Combine only if both fail independently. Remember, DS is not about long calculations but about clarity of reasoning. A structured GMAT prep course can help you practice this process until it becomes second nature. These skills also sharpen decision-making that matters far beyond the exam, including the MBA admissions process, where clarity and judgment are highly valued.

 

When is a Data Sufficiency Statement Considered Sufficient?

Data Sufficiency (DS) is not about solving to a final value. It is about deciding whether the information given is enough to reach a unique and consistent conclusion. That conclusion may be a single numeric value, a definite yes, or a definite no. If multiple answers remain possible, or if the outcome is maybe, the statement is not sufficient.

Therefore, DS statements are considered sufficient in the following three scenarios.

A unique and consistent numeric value

A statement is sufficient if it fixes exactly one value with no ambiguity. Example: “x2=49x^2 = 49 and x>0x > 0” gives x=7x = 7. Because the value is unique and consistent, the statement is sufficient.

A consistent “yes”

For a yes or no question, a statement is sufficient if it always forces a yes. Example: “Is xx even?” The statement “xx is a multiple of 4” guarantees yes. That makes the statement sufficient.

A consistent “no”

A statement is sufficient if it always forces a no. Example: “Is x=7x = 7?” The statement “xx is even” guarantees no. Since the answer is consistently no, the statement is sufficient.

When “No” is Enough

Students often assume that only yes qualifies as sufficient. The video shows otherwise.

For example, if asked, “Are you Jack from New York City?” and the statement is “I am John,” the answer is clearly “no”.

Because the response is consistent, the statement is sufficient.

Similarly, “I am from DC” also produces a definite no. In both cases, the answer is option D, since each statement works on its own.

When “Maybe” Means Insufficient

Ambiguity destroys sufficiency.

If the statement is “I am Jack,” then the question “Are you Jack from New York City?” remains unanswered.

The outcome could be yes or no. This “maybe” signals insufficiency.

Another example: “I am from DC” leads to a definite no, but “I am Jack” alone is insufficient.

Combine Only Each Statement Failed Independently

Combining is the last resort, used only when both statements fail alone.

If Statement 1 is “I am Jack” and Statement 2 is “I am from New York City,” then each separately leaves room for maybe.

But together, they prove yes. The correct choice here is C.

A GMAT-Like Question

Question: Is X = 7?

• Statement (1): X is not a prime number.
• Statement (2): X is an even number.

Statement 1 alone:

Since 7 is prime, X cannot be 7. Answer: no. Sufficient.

Statement 2 alone:

Again, 7 is not even, so X cannot be 7. Answer: no. Sufficient.

Each works independently, so the correct answer choice is D.

Please notice that:

• No calculation of X was needed.
• No combining the statements was needed. 

The Lesson of DS

Data Sufficiency is about clarity, not calculation. Always test each statement independently, combine only when both fail, and remember that both yes and no can be sufficient. Only maybe is insufficient. With practice, this process builds calm, structured thinking. These are the very judgment skills that top business schools value, the same skills you can strengthen further through consistent practice with high volume of GMAT practice tests.

Parting Thought

The essence of Data Sufficiency lies in recognizing when information is enough to reach a firm conclusion. Whether it is a unique number, a definite yes, or a definite no, clarity is the goal. With steady practice, you will learn to separate certainty from ambiguity, avoid the trap of “maybe,” and approach every question with calm confidence. This mindset not only improves your GMAT performance but also builds the logical discipline and judgment that will serve you well in business school and beyond.

 

To know your current GMAT level, take a free full length GMAT mock test